<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:02:27 GMT--><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rss="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"><rss:channel rdf:about="http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/"><rss:title>Negative Spaces</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/</rss:link><rss:description></rss:description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><dc:date>2012-02-11T18:02:27Z</dc:date><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.squarespace.com/">Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</admin:generatorAgent><rss:items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/2/9/scratch-lab.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/2/5/textures-of-las-vegas.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/2/5/textures-of-los-angeles.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/2/4/leica-m9-digital-rangefinder.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/1/31/2-clarifications.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/1/30/james-camerons-3d-rules.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/1/29/livegrade-update.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/1/26/fletcher-2012-camera-comparison-chart.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/1/24/jamsync-by-light-illusion.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/1/12/ces-2012-the-goods.html"/></rdf:Seq></rss:items></rss:channel><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/2/9/scratch-lab.html"><rss:title>Scratch Lab</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/2/9/scratch-lab.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Ben Cain</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-02-10T00:18:13Z</dc:date><dc:subject>DIT / video engineering color correction dailies</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/SCRATCHLab-intro-screen__89901_zoom.jpeg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328886833215" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>I've been demo-ing <a href="http://www.assimilateinc.com/products-scratch-lab-overview">Scratch Lab by Assimilate</a> - very smart, very slick software for the creation of on-set deliverables. It's interesting because there are a lot of tools available now for transcoding raw or uncorrected camera media into great looking, synced up files ready to go for the editor or whomever else needs them. Among these workflow options we run the price gamut from free to moderately expensive to extremely expensive and all of them basically do the same thing but with varying degrees of efficiency and economy. I think the versatility of Scratch Lab, while certainly an investment at 6000 USD, is appropriately priced in relation to the other available solutions. This software really was designed with the on-set colorist in mind and can accomodate any sort of workflow that could be thrown at you and can output just about any flavor of file you would ever be asked for. And it's fast. I've been rendering 23.98 Alexa ProRes4444 to Avid DNx36 with LUT bake-in and audio at faster than realtime (just over 30 frames per second) on a MacBook Pro. Doing the same thing with Resolve Lite (minus the audio of course) seems to average at about half this speed, 15-16 frames per second. I'll be using Scratch Lab on a tower next week so will report back with numbers. There is a bit of learning curve with this software but Assimilate has a great online knowledge base at <a href="http://www.assimilatesupport.com/akb/default.aspx">http://www.assimilatesupport.com</a>, <a href="http://www.assimilateinc.com/support/tutorials-lab">video tutorials</a>, and actual human beings you can talk with on the phone if you have a problem! Helpful people like Sherif Sadek, New York City "Assimilator"; point person for all things Scratch.</p>
<p>If you're in the east coast market and would like a Scratch demo, please contact Sherif -&nbsp;<span><a href="mailto: sherif@assimilateinc.com">sherif@assimilateinc.com</a></span></p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/2/5/textures-of-las-vegas.html"><rss:title>Textures of Las Vegas</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/2/5/textures-of-las-vegas.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Ben Cain</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-02-05T18:57:11Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Leica digital photography</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/quick-photo/L1000999.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328468297858" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/quick-photo/L1001009.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328468317995" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/quick-photo/L1001010.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328468350985" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/quick-photo/L1001014.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328468380450" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/quick-photo/L1001024.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328468407746" alt="" /></span></span></p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/2/5/textures-of-los-angeles.html"><rss:title>Textures of Los Angeles</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/2/5/textures-of-los-angeles.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Ben Cain</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-02-05T05:13:47Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Leica digital photography</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/quick-photo/L1000342.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328418967264" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/quick-photo/L1000324.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328420010287" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/quick-photo/L1000392.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328466675921" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/quick-photo/L1000382.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328419020672" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/quick-photo/L1000402.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328419066274" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/quick-photo/L1000407.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328419110991" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/quick-photo/L1000414.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328419167696" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/quick-photo/L1000438.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328419192183" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/quick-photo/L1000450.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328419219215" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/quick-photo/L1000511.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328419291943" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/quick-photo/L1001026.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328419314991" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/quick-photo/L1000481.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328420399584" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/quick-photo/L1000377.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328466613802" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/quick-photo/L1000562.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328466639177" alt="" /></span></span></p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/2/4/leica-m9-digital-rangefinder.html"><rss:title>Leica M9 Digital Rangefinder</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/2/4/leica-m9-digital-rangefinder.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Ben Cain</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-02-05T00:03:09Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Leica digital photography</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 500px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/leica-m9.jpeg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328403168530" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>What a pleasure it is to shoot this camera! A friend of mine (thanks, <a href="http://19shotsgoodluck.com/">Marsh</a>)&nbsp;was kind enough to loan me his for my recent trip out west.</p>
<p>For me, this is the ultimate stills camera - built like a tank, feels great in your hand and at your eye, and it's the only full frame digital camera that fits in your jacket pocket. Even the sound of the shutter is pleasing. The M9 is everything that's great about a classic rangefinder - small size, low profile, super accurate focus - with the immediacy of digital. But with a list price of 7995 USD and lenses ranging from $2000-7000, it's definitely not a cheap system to get into.</p>
<p>We've seen these charts 1000 times already but the appeal of the M9 is obviously that big fat sensor so here it is in context -</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/428px-SensorSizes.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328400921514" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 500px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/11696689-51obs81ofcl.jpeg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328403145832" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>Another advantage of the digital Leica experience is the wealth of vintage, manual focus M Mount lenses available for it. You can find decent deals on Leica and Voigtlander glass from vendors such as&nbsp;<a href="http://www.tamarkin.com/">Tamarkin</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="http://www.keh.com/">Keh Camera</a>&nbsp;but they still aren't cheap - the average cost of a used lens being over $1000. When I had the camera, I was working with a lovely old, uncoated 35mm Leica lens with a soft focus similar in quality to a 1/2 Pro Mist. It's a lot of fun experimenting with old lenses but in a digital, raw format.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The&nbsp;<a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/649923-USA/Leica_10704_M9_Rangefinder_Digital_Camera.html">specs</a>&nbsp;at a glance&nbsp;-<br /><br />- 18 Megapixels<br />- Full-Frame 35mm CCD Sensor<br />- 2.5" LCD<br />- Classic Rangefinder Design<br />- Intuitive Controls<br />- Quiet, Metal Blade Shutter<br />- High Sensitivity (ISO 2500)<br />- M Mount Compatible&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>QUALITY!</strong></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/photo-5.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328401619537" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>Menus and functionality are simple and intuitive. A person with a basic working knowledge of digital photography can be up and running on this camera in minutes.</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/photo.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328401676048" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>This is a very cool, nostalgiac design feature - the underside looks just like a film rangerfinder. Lift and turn the latch and..</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/photo-4.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328401750592" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/photo-1.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328401888233" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>It looks like you could stick a roll of film in there. Kind of a fun nod to Leica's legacy. And yes I've incriminated myself with the lowest level of gear nerdery by pointing that out publicly.&nbsp;</p>
<p>When I think of Leica, I think of mechanical and optical excellence and not necessarily sensors and image processing. For digital, this is obviously the other half of the equation and while I'm not dissappointed, I'm not overly impressed with this camera's low light performance. You start to pick up noise at 800 ISO and at 1600, it's pretty bad. It's not the ugliest noise I've seen and I suppose in some regard it has its own artistic merit but for what you're spending on this camera, one would hope to have more flexibility with the ISO. Canon and Nikon have been at the forefront of sensor design and image processing and the sensitivity / low light resolution in their latest batch of DSLR's has been remarkable. You will not find performance like this with the M9 sadly. The sensor in this camera is the <a href="http://www.kodak.com/ek/US/en/Image_Sensor_Solutions/KODAK_CCD_Image_Sensor_Powers_New_LEICA_M9_Digital_Camera.htm">Kodak KAF-18500</a>&nbsp;CCD, interestingly enough a 2/3" iteration of this same sensor is found in the&nbsp;<a href="http://www.siliconimaging.com/DigitalCinema/SI_2K_key_features.html">Silicon Imaging SI-2K</a> motion picture camera.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Enough yammering, some shots -&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/quick-photo/L1000675.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328413909871" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/quick-photo/L1000624.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328412957423" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/quick-photo/L1000664.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328412991991" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/quick-photo/L1000743.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328413022727" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/quick-photo/L1000791.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328413053936" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/quick-photo/L1000854.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1328413083046" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.negativespaces.com/stills/">Higher Res Versions are available in my Stills Gallery &gt;&gt;&gt;</a></p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/1/31/2-clarifications.html"><rss:title>2 Clarifications -</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/1/31/2-clarifications.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Ben Cain</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-01-31T19:37:12Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the syncing of audio to video files - In the United States, this is the job of the assistant editor. Really, no person on the set should be asked to do this as it's someone else's jurisdictionally protected job. This may be the case but it certainly hasn't stopped producers and interestingly enough, editorial houses from requesting that it be done. However like many other recent developments, the whole topic has become a bit of a gray area. We'll see how it all shakes out. I would not encourage anyone to violate any rules or regulations or to do the work of someone else if asked. How you choose to use any software or hardware discussed on this site is completely up to you.</p>
<p>In my previous post on <a href="http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2011/12/8/davinci-resolve-lite.html">Resolve Lite</a>, I said it's great for generating a production's "deliverables" on the set. What I should have said is "editorial media" which is the most commonly requested deliverable. Resolve excels at this but isn't the best solution out there for creating multiple files sets simulataneouly with burn in's, etc. There are several dedicated systems available that can do this with far greater efficiency. We'll take a closer look at those on this site in the near future.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/1/30/james-camerons-3d-rules.html"><rss:title>James Cameron's "3D Rules"</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/1/30/james-camerons-3d-rules.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Ben Cain</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-01-30T17:10:06Z</dc:date><dc:subject>3D</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>This is good -</strong></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/james-cameron-3d_250px.jpeg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1327943447649" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>1. There is no screen</p>
<p>2. Stereo is very subjective</p>
<p>3. Analyzing stereospace on freeze frames can be misleading</p>
<p>4. Convergence CANNOT fix stereo-space problems</p>
<p>5. Convergence is almost always set on the eyes of the actor talking</p>
<p>6. Interocular distance varies in direct proportion to subject distance from the lens shots</p>
<p>7. Interocular and convergence should both vary dynamically throughout moving shots</p>
<p>8. In a composite, the foreground and background may want to have different interoculars</p>
<p>9. When stereo looks bad to the eye (visual cortex) it is important to eliminate the problems sequentially:&nbsp;Sync, reverse stereo, Vertical mismatch, color/density mismatch, render errors, highlights, image warping, vibrations</p>
<p>10. Some shots just can't be fixed</p>
<p><a href="http://www.stereoscopynews.com/hotnews/history/digital/2166-camerons-10-rules-for-good-stereo.html">via Stereoscopy News</a></p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/1/29/livegrade-update.html"><rss:title>LiveGrade Update</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/1/29/livegrade-update.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Ben Cain</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-01-29T16:44:47Z</dc:date><dc:subject>DIT / video engineering color correction dailies software</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've been beta testing <a href="http://pomfort.com/livegrade/">LiveGrade</a>, an application "for interactive manipulation of live video",&nbsp;since it was released a few months ago. This software's biggest appeal for me is support for the Avid Artist Panel (formerly Euphonix MC Color).&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/9333_avid_artist_color_photo_lg.jpeg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1327855648126" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>As of the latest beta, the Avid Artist surface is working great. To be able to grade in realtime on the set with one of these is a joy. Additionally, the HDLink Pro 3D LUT export lines up very nicely in Resolve if that's where you'll be generating the color corrected dailies. Interestingly, it also exports a native Resolve .dat LUT but I've found that the HDLink export actually lines up cleaner. Using multiple HDLinks in the software is also working trouble free. LiveGrade still has some bugs to be sorted but progress has been steady.&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/1/26/fletcher-2012-camera-comparison-chart.html"><rss:title>Fletcher 2012 Camera Comparison Chart</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/1/26/fletcher-2012-camera-comparison-chart.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Ben Cain</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-01-26T13:54:06Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every year Fletcher updates this chart with the latest cameras and firmware. Very handy for quick reference.</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><a href="http://www.fletch.com/images/2012_Camera_Comparison_Chart.pdf"><img style="width: 750px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/fletch.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1327586239511" alt="" /></a></span></span></p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/1/24/jamsync-by-light-illusion.html"><rss:title>JamSync by Light Illusion</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/1/24/jamsync-by-light-illusion.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Ben Cain</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-01-25T04:47:02Z</dc:date><dc:subject>software</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had&nbsp;<a href="http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2011/12/8/davinci-resolve-lite.html">blogged</a>&nbsp;awhile back detailing the challenges of creating a production's deliverables (editorial media, iPad dallies, etc) on the set. One of the most potentially time and labor intensive aspects of this process is syncing sound to the video files to create independent clips with embedded audio. There are a lot of ways to do this, the most streamlined and expedient usually involving very expensive software such as <a href="http://www.assimilateinc.com/products-overview">Scratch</a>, <a href="http://www.onsetdailies.com/">On-Set Dailies</a>, or&nbsp;<a href="http://www.yoyotta.com/start.html">YoYo</a>.&nbsp;The cheaper alternative being rolling up your sleeves and doing it manually clip by clip in an NLE such as FCP or Avid.</p>
<p>Wouldn't it be nice if there was an inexpensive software that could take separate sound and video files with synchronous timecode and batch generate new files with embedded audio?&nbsp;</p>
<p>You're in luck. Now there is.&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><a href="http://www.lightillusion.com/placeorder_jamsync.htm"><img style="width: 400px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/registrationjamsync.jpeg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1327468506025" alt="" /></a></span></span></p>
<p>Introducing <a href="http://www.lightillusion.com/jamsync.htm">JamSync by Light Illusion</a>, a terminal based utility&nbsp;for batch syncing picture and sound. It works for .mov and DNxHD .mxf. I was involved in this software's development and have been using the beta version for awhile. All I can say now that it's live and available for purchase is that works great. To be able to sync files outside of an NLE saves an incredible amount of time and energy and JamSync provides the missing link for a lot of existing workflows. All it requires is synchronous timecode in both sound and video but it does allow you to offset by frame count in the event of timecode drift.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Please note that this software will NOT work with DSLR footage as these cameras do not generate timecode. JamSync is a timecode based utility and no timecode means no sync. For DSLR, <a href="http://www.singularsoftware.com/pluraleyes.html">PluralEyes</a> is still the best solution for automated syncing.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Also new are the <a href="http://www.lightillusion.com/forums/">Light Illusion Forums</a>&nbsp;for providing feedback and sharing information and user experiences for all of Light Illusion's products including <a href="http://www.lightillusion.com/alexicc.htm">Alexicc</a> and <a href="http://www.lightillusion.com/jamsync.htm">JamSync</a>.&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lightillusion.com/placeorder_jamsync.htm">The price is <span>&pound;</span>145 (about 225 USD) &gt;&gt;&gt;&nbsp;</a></p>
<p>Here's a video demo of the software in action:</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><a href="http://homepage.mac.com/lindsayellis/Sites/jamsync06a.mov"><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/jamsyncvid.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1327469230207" alt="" /></a></span></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lightillusion.com/zippdf/idiots_guide_to_jamsync.pdf">And the JamSync QuickStart Guide &gt;&gt;&gt;</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/1/12/ces-2012-the-goods.html"><rss:title>CES 2012 - the goods</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.negativespaces.com/blog/2012/1/12/ces-2012-the-goods.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Ben Cain</dc:creator><dc:date>2012-01-12T21:15:56Z</dc:date><dc:subject>3D CES</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My attendance at this year's show was completely unplanned and my time short so didn't have the opportunity to dig too deep. The #1 thing I was interested in this year was the Glasses-Free 3DTV's. If it isn't already evident, I'm a huge proponent for stereoscopic 3D and the large role I see it playing in the future of media consumption. While wearing glasses doesn't bother me at all, I completely sympathize with the overwhelming majority of viewers who would rather not have to put on goofy glasses in order to watch tv. That said, autostereoscopic displays - those that utilize a 3D effect without the use of glasses - is the next evolution of the technology and will hopefully make 3D content consumption more appealing to a wider audience.&nbsp;</p>
<p>I did a quick walk-through the whole space from north to south, stopping only at the booths I knew would have the product I came to see - Toshiba, Sony, Microsoft, Intel, Canon, Samsung, Panasonic, and a few others.&nbsp;</p>
<p>From what I saw, the themes this year are - giant LED tv's that are getting thinner and lighter, 4K displays and projection, internet enabled / voice and motion controlled "smart tv's", and 3D in every conceivable flavor.&nbsp;</p>
<p>I had blogged a bit earlier about a 55" Glasses-Free 3DTV from Toshiba that looked very promising. The first thing I did was find this TV and yes indeed, it is very promising. I saw a handful of new glasses-free TV's from various manufacturers and on a whole, this technology is light years beyond what was shown even 9 months ago at NAB. It's not perfect yet but definitely on the right track and probably about a year away from really being ready for a strong entry into the market.&nbsp;</p>
<p>(Please excuse the crummy iPhone pics)</p>
<p><strong>TOSHIBA:</strong></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/IMG_1908.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1326404409270" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>Of any company at the show, Toshiba put the most empahsis on 3D; especailly Glasses-Free, with several TV's and laptops on display.&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/IMG_1906.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1326404583505" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>Here's the aforementioned 55" Autostereo 4K TV showing Coraline in 1080p.&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/IMG_1904.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1326404748064" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>So here's what I think - the technology isn't quite there yet but well on its way. The images actually look very dimensional and the cross talk is minimal. It's a very pleasing, very convincing effect but there's room for improvement. There are supposedly 9 comfortable viewing angles in which the 3D can be fused (if you're off-angle, the picture looks like a normal 3D image with your glasses off). However to really the get the best effect, you need to be right on top of it or to the immediate right or left. The viewing angle, while an enormous improvement over what I saw last year, is still pretty unforgiving.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Toshiba even put footprints indicating the best place to stand for the full effect.</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/IMG_1901.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1326405147313" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>These TV's were actually quite comfortable to look at. For autostereo - the bigger the better. The 3D Gameboy thing gives me a headache as did all the tablets and laptops I saw at the show. A big display, being on axis, and a comfortable distance from the screen are key to having a good viewer experience. The problem is still that the lenticular filtration that makes this possible gives itself away very easily. It's a significant improvement with the Toshiba TV but there is still some work to do. On a big screen seen from far away, it's barely noticeable. On a small screen seen up close, you can really see the filters and it's both distracting and unattractive. On a whole, I don't think this technology is quite ready for market. Though perhaps this time next year, it may be ready for roll out.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Toshiba Glasses-Free 3D 15" Laptop (not so easy on the eyes)</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/IMG_1893.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1326416260562" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>Some more info on the 55" 4K Glasses-Free 3D Display:</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/IMG_1885.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1326406208003" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/IMG_1886.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1326406235419" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/IMG_1891.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1326406260196" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><strong>SONY:</strong></p>
<p>Sony had some very interesting stuff on display, most noticeably this -</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/IMG_1949.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1326406671574" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>Personal Stereoscopic Headsets. I knew this was on its way.. It's just such an obvious application for the the medium. These headsets are comfortable to wear, comfortable to view, and are the equivalent of a 150" 3D home theatre screen. While primarily intended for gaming use, the applications of this technology are limitless - <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augmented_reality">augmented reality</a> being one of the first that comes to mind.&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/IMG_1947.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1326407145151" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/IMG_1940.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1326407174926" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/IMG_1945.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1326407197967" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>Sony had a few Glasses-Free 3DTV's as well, both a 46" and 24". About the same as the Toshiba really though like I said, the bigger the better and the small Sony TV really hurt your eyes after awhile.&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/IMG_1942.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1326407426154" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><strong>TCL:</strong></p>
<p>A company called TCL (The Creative Life) who I had never heard of had some interesting wares on display - a very nice 37" Autostereo TV, Holographic TV concept, and a truly odd application of circular polarization - A Dual Display TV where 2 people sitting side by side can watch totally different content at the same time on the same tv. So you and your significant other can snuggle up together on the couch with your glasses and headphones and watch totally different shows while enjoying quality time together.. Interesting. I'll leave it at that.&nbsp;</p>
<p>This TV from TCL actually had the most pronounced depth of any that I saw. It seems that because of the way lenticular displays work, a stereo window where the depth is mostly behind the screen plane, seems to be more gentle on the eyes and easier for the brain to fuse. I think the content playing on a lot of these screens had the convergence adjusted so that the stereo window was more prounounced. Not this one though, the stuff they were showing was very strong in the negative stereo space and the effect, though not entirely comfortable, was interesting to see on a glasses-free display.&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/IMG_1911.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1326416984496" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>Dual Display TV - for those who just can't settle on what to watch. It uses the exact same polarization technique that 3DTV's use only instead of one wavelength corresponding to one eye, it sends it to both. Consequently you can view two completely different things on the same screen.&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/IMG_1914.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1326417261578" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>Holographic TV - this was just a concept but interesting nonetheless. Don't know much about how holographic technology works but to see fully dimensional objects on different planes was fascinating.&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/IMG_1915.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1326417457724" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/IMG_1916.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1326417490956" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><strong>SHARP:</strong></p>
<p><strong><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/IMG_1921.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1326418317044" alt="" /></span></span></strong></p>
<p>With everyone trying to catch up to 4K, why not think a few years down the road to 8K?</p>
<p>Here you go - 8K LCD TV</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/IMG_1922.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1326418367960" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/IMG_1926.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1326418401556" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>Last year at NAB, NHK (Japan's national broadcaster) was showing a 8K UHDTV (Ultra HD) concept camera. Resolution like that is obviously best appreciated natively so Sharp came up with this concept display in which all <span style="color: #222222;">7690x4230 of the camera's pixels are displayed one-to-one. It may sound cliche but words can't really describe this kind of resolution in motion pictures. This display could very easily be a window for the viewer to peer into a totally life-like video respresentation of the real world.&nbsp;</span></p>
<p><strong>ACTIVE VS. PASSIVE 3DTV:</strong></p>
<p>As for the Active Shutter vs. Passive Display war - the market is cleanly divided into two camps with LG being the biggest proponent of passive technology. All of their new TV's are passive 3D and in my opnion, look so much better than any Sony or Panasonic Active Shutter TV. At their booth they handed out passive glasses and you could just freely walk around, checking out all of their TV's, including an 84" OLED, without having to put your face in active glasses mounted to the floor. It's just better.&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>CANON:</strong></p>
<p><strong><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/IMG_1957.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1326419127338" alt="" /></span></span></strong></p>
<p>Canon C300 -</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/IMG_1951.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1326419175568" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>I got to play around with this a little and it's a very nice camera. Being a colorist, I can't get beyond the 8 bit color but other than that, I think this camera is a winner. It has some very nice functionality and the image is fantastic. The coolest thing I saw at Canon wasn't on display but rather a video they presented showing an iPad interfacing with the C300 and EF lenses. With this app, you have total remote control over focus, iris, and all the menus and fucntionality of the camera. That is just awesome.</p>
<p><strong>JVC:</strong></p>
<p>And JVC's handheld 4K camcorder aka "Falconbrid". I saw the prototype last year at NAB and 9 months later, it looks very close to roll out.&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 700px;" src="http://www.negativespaces.com/storage/images/general-posts/IMG_1880.JPG?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1326407991795" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>It's the real deal - a 4K camcorder. Having resolution like this is great, but the emphasis really should be on a large, quality imager and strong codec which I don't think you'll find in this camera. For the money, the 4K camera to beat is definitely the Scarlet but for ENG applications, this little cam could find its market. Who knows, maybe lens adapters will make a comeback ;)</p>
<p>That's all I've got. Very exicting stuff but what I was able to get to obviously only scratched the surface. It seems like there has been such an explosion of new wares in the past 9 months that I'm starting to think that this year's NAB could be a little sleepy. It seems like most of the major players have already released their flagship products that will carry them through the next few years. Who know though.. Just have to wait and see.&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item></rdf:RDF>
