Negative Spaces
This area does not yet contain any content.
Recent Comments
Search Negative Spaces
« Unbeleafable 3D | Main | Little Big Disk »
Saturday
Nov122011

Leica D-LUX5

 

I sold my Canon 5D Mark 2 package recently so as to not be tempted to shoot video with it. But I miss shooting stills bad so have been trying to find a small camera to tide me over until the the "next big thing" comes out, whatever that may be. Personally, I'm hoping for a full frame (though APS-C is more likely) Canon or Nikon EVIL camera, a Mirrorless SLR - basically a small housing containing the sensor block, electronic viewfinder, and interface - something more or less like the Sony Alpha NEX-7 but maybe even smaller. I realize that's a tall order but not outside the realm of possibility. 

I've been playing around with the Leica D-LUX 5, basically a point and shoot with the inclusion of advanced manual control and RAW image capture which is what turned me on to it. 

 

It's a great size which is probably the best thing it has going for it. I must confess, that little red Leica logo looks pretty sharp but is it worth $800? The Panasonic LX5 is the EXACT same camera sans the Leica logo and is less than half the price. Supposedly the lens coatings are better in the Leica D-LUX 5 but that's neither here not there. Unfortunately, the D-LUX 5's camera's sensor is a miniscule 1/1.63".

In this era of affordable large sensor capture where shallow depth of field is omnipresent, there is nothing sexy or emotionally exciting about images from a sensor this small. Photographed objects have no roundness and there is no optical separation indicating depth within the scene. This is my number one grief with point and shoot cameras. My other big grief is also sensor related - imagers this small are very prone to noise and have a hard time resolving much of anything in low light, even with a relatively fast lens, f/2, like on the D-LUX 5. 

The RAW capture is a great feature and in my opinion, should be an option on more stills cameras at this price point. It's nice to have a little flexibility to work with the image after the fact but unfortunately the image isn't robust enough to really push it around as much as you might like. The noise floor becomes apparent quickly even at low ISO's so you still need to be very careful with your exposures and get as much light in there as you can before clipping. 

Because it's so small and inconspicuous, the photographer is able to get work and keep a low profile. Here are a few images I got down at Zuccotti Park of the Occupy Wall Streeters. I like some of these but I wish there was more optical separation and it's just not possible with an imager this small. 

The long and short of it is - this is a nice camera but anyone spoiled by higher quality images will find it a little dissappointing. I'm holding out for something nice and small with at least a APC-C imager though. 

This thing actually looks kind of cool.. Fujifilm X100

Reader Comments (4)

Mirrors and rangefinders are such anachronisms in modern digital imaging... I share your anticipation for Canon and Nikon mirrorless bodies with 'proper' sensors and lens mounts.

P.S. I love my X100 to death, it's definitely worth a look!

November 12, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterGord Stephen

I did the same thing and I regret ever getting rid of my MarkII. bought the x100 and despise the damn thing. I settled on a gf2. The price and size are perfect. I am not going to pay 1200$ for a point and shoot. None of these companies have quite nailed it in my book. These companies come out with "pocketable" cameras but the lenses you put on them are the size of a DSLR lens. Hopefully we will see something much better in the future.

November 14, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterEric Matthew

You're spot on Ben. I was very excited when I saw the Fuji X100. So close but yet so far off. I'm not a cheap person but I can't justify buying an M9 much-less the price of Leica lenses. (this coming from a guy who owns a full set of ZE primes for my 5D) What happened to the days when japanese camera companies made great German inspired knock offs? It's so frustrating watching these camera designers trying to reinvent the wheel. I'd pay 5D prices for a good M9 inspired system.

November 22, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterHernan Otano

Hernan, great to hear from you my friend. A 5D price for an M9 inspired system would be fantastic... If only! I'm holding my breath though.

December 3, 2011 | Registered CommenterBen Cain

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>